Re: Future ISPF directions
- From: Paul Gilmartin <gilmap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:38:00 -0600
In a recent note, Mark Zelden said:
> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:55:25 -0500
>
> On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 13:23:44 -0700, Edward E. Jaffe
> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> >Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> >
> >>I wondered about the value of PDSE here. Alas, however, our
> >>test systems exceed in number and span of releases both limits
> >>for SYSPLEX. Using PDSE would aggravate the ENQ logjam.
> >
> >Just the opposite should be true. It sounds like you're *already*
> >sharing a single ISPF profile data set without serialization.
>
> It also sounds like he may be sharing between sysplexes (via MII)?
> If that's true, then for sure he wouldn't want to use PDSE.
>
> Paul, are you sharing between sysplexes?
>
Note my earliest update above.
Thanks,
gil
--
StorageTek
INFORMATION made POWERFUL
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to listserv@xxxxxxxxxxx with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
.
- Prev by Date: Re: RMF Spread*** Report
- Next by Date: Re: Question on IXFP PTFs
- Previous by thread: Re: Future ISPF directions
- Next by thread: Re: Future ISPF directions
- Index(es):