Re: Future ISPF directions
- From: Mark Zelden <mark.zelden@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:55:25 -0500
On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 13:23:44 -0700, Edward E. Jaffe
<edjaffe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Paul Gilmartin wrote:
>
>>I wondered about the value of PDSE here. Alas, however, our
>>test systems exceed in number and span of releases both limits
>>for SYSPLEX. Using PDSE would aggravate the ENQ logjam.
>>
>>
>
>Just the opposite should be true. It sounds like you're *already*
>sharing a single ISPF profile data set without serialization.
>
It also sounds like he may be sharing between sysplexes (via MII)?
If that's true, then for sure he wouldn't want to use PDSE.
Paul, are you sharing between sysplexes?
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America and Farmers Insurance Group
mailto: mark.zelden@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Systems Programming expert at http://Search390.com/ateExperts/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to listserv@xxxxxxxxxxx with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Future ISPF directions
- Next by Date: Re: VTS performance
- Previous by thread: Re: Future ISPF directions
- Next by thread: Re: Future ISPF directions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
