Re: New Cobol Releases (was FASTSRT)
- From: "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" <shmuel+ibm-main@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 09:07:45 -0300
In <43130819.4090203@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, on 08/29/2005
at 03:05 PM, "R.S." <R.Skorupka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>> The testing logistics to convert en masse are ridiculous.
>???
>I don't understand.
If you put the recompiled code into production then you must test it.
Ted is saying that the testing makes a mass recompile too expensive.
>Oh, I also have documentation to every program, is it also
>ridiculous ?
Do you rewrite your documentation every time you recompile? If not,
what's your point? Ted wasn't saying that testing is ridiculous, he
was saying that making a change that requires testing all of your
programs at once is ridiculous.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to listserv@xxxxxxxxxxx with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
.
- References:
- Re: New Cobol Releases (was FASTSRT)
- From: R.S.
- Re: New Cobol Releases (was FASTSRT)
- Prev by Date: Re: New Cobol Releases (was FASTSRT)
- Next by Date: Deleted VVDS
- Previous by thread: Re: New Cobol Releases (was FASTSRT)
- Next by thread: Re: New Cobol Releases (was FASTSRT)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
