Re: Blade Runner... for real this time?

In article <18qohoyc8w2bb.eo9iio40fjay.dlg@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Galbraith
<me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sun, 28 May 2006 08:29:07 -0400, Joshua Zyber wrote:

[snip]

Also worth noting is that Blade Runner has always been slightly flawed
and in need of just a little bit of tweaking. The 1982 theatrical cuts
had the bad voiceover and Stupid Happy Ending. The 1992 "Director's Cut"
fixed those things but lost little pieces of violent footage that had
been in the old European theatrical cut. There's never really been a
"perfect" version of Blade Runner, and so fans have been willing to give
Ridley Scott another chance to get it right.

So there's the theatrical cut, the 1992 Directors Cut and the new
Directors Cut. Whats the 4th cut?

The European theatrical cut mentioned above, with the extra violence
that probably would have given the film an X rating in the US.

--
Chris Mack "Refugee, total ***. That's how I've always seen us.
'Invid Fan' Not a help, you'll admit, to agreement between us."
-'Deal/No Deal', CHESS
.

Quantcast