Re: So, um...Digital downloads vs. DVD?
- From: Invid Fan <invid@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 12:47:14 -0500
In article <1e0yotjjkbsx4$.1i06y7rf4r9ns$.dlg@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jay G. <
"@tmbg.org> wrote:
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 21:23:15 -0500, Derek Janssen wrote:It is interesting that people are willing to pay more for just the
Yeah, but--if it were possible to use yellow highlighter on Usenet
posts--one might need to underline the bits about customers saying "Why
SHOULD we download something in crappy bit-form when it's on DVD for the
same price?" and "Geez, what a ripoff!"
It's not on DVD, and when it does come out, it won't be for the same price.
In contrast, the CD *is* out, and has been available for the same price as
it is on iTunes. Yet I don't see people complaining about that album's
price.
music then music+video. iTunes is also selling individual music videos
from the show, and it would be interesting to see if those sell better
then the entire movie.
--
Chris Mack "Refugee, total shit. That's how I've always seen us.
'Invid Fan' Not a help, you'll admit, to agreement between us."
-'Deal/No Deal', CHESS
.
- References:
- So, um...Digital downloads vs. DVD?
- From: Derek Janssen
- Re: So, um...Digital downloads vs. DVD?
- From: Invid Fan
- Re: So, um...Digital downloads vs. DVD?
- From: Derek Janssen
- Re: So, um...Digital downloads vs. DVD?
- From: Jay G.
- So, um...Digital downloads vs. DVD?
- Prev by Date: Re: Have you ever considered of mousing ambidextrously?
- Next by Date: Re: Circuit City Exploring DVD Pricing?
- Previous by thread: Re: So, um...Digital downloads vs. DVD?
- Next by thread: Re: So, um...Digital downloads vs. DVD?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|