Re: Jackson KING KONG remake (was Why Not Released???)
- From: The Man Behind The Curtain <johngrabowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 19:00:45 GMT
Lookingglass wrote:
"Dick Sidbury" <drjamessidbury@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:3jo47mFqud1pU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Justin wrote:
The type that thought iRobot was a good film.
Do I count? I thought it was a good summer MOVIE.
dick -- but I knew going in that it was not related at all to the book.
Yeah................ it wasn't supposed to be Shakespeare. Just a lark...!
dave........ www.Shemakhan.com
Comments like that, while sound all educated and clever, have no meaning. Shakespeare wasn't supposed to be "Shakespeare." Shakespeare was a mass-market artist who just knew how to tell a good story and paid attention to plot. Something almost no one today can do, and I mean even in the so called "serious" movies.
John
--
Von Herzen, moge es wieder zu Herzen gehen. --Beethoven
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Jackson KING KONG remake (was Why Not Released???)
- From: Lookingglass
- Re: Jackson KING KONG remake (was Why Not Released???)
- References:
- Re: Why Not Released???
- From: The Man Behind The Curtain
- Jackson KING KONG remake (was Why Not Released???)
- From: Lookingglass
- Re: Jackson KING KONG remake (was Why Not Released???)
- From: Dick Sidbury
- Re: Jackson KING KONG remake (was Why Not Released???)
- From: Lookingglass
- Re: Why Not Released???
- Prev by Date: Re: MGM DVD Settlement - anyone get anything?
- Next by Date: Re: Blu-ray better than HD-DVD. Claim
- Previous by thread: Re: Jackson KING KONG remake (was Why Not Released???)
- Next by thread: Re: Jackson KING KONG remake (was Why Not Released???)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|