Re: Blu-ray better than HD-DVD. Claim
- From: RichA <none@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 15:19:48 -0400
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 10:07:03 -0400, Allan
<Spamstillsucks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 02:38:38 -0400, RichA <none@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>>BTW; The Japanese apparently have blu-ray recorders.
>>Are there NO pictures of these caddyless discs out there?
>>They must be using something?
>
>http://www.blu-ray.com/media/
>
Thanks, that's interesting. Some stand alone, some in caddies.
It should be interesting to see how one machine can deal with them
both, or will certain machines be confined to only certain media?
-Rich
>
>
>
>
>
>"Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game
>because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from
>-- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time."
>- Neil Stephenson, _Cryptonomicon_
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Blu-ray better than HD-DVD. Claim
- From: Alpha
- Re: Blu-ray better than HD-DVD. Claim
- References:
- Re: Blu-ray better than HD-DVD. Claim
- From: RichA
- Re: Blu-ray better than HD-DVD. Claim
- From: Allan
- Re: Blu-ray better than HD-DVD. Claim
- From: RichA
- Re: Blu-ray better than HD-DVD. Claim
- From: Allan
- Re: Blu-ray better than HD-DVD. Claim
- Prev by Date: Re: How long does copy take you?
- Next by Date: Re: How long does copy take you?
- Previous by thread: Re: Blu-ray better than HD-DVD. Claim
- Next by thread: Re: Blu-ray better than HD-DVD. Claim
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading