Re: OT: Roku HD box
- From: tom ronson <theavlv.ronson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:31:22 -0700
CLM in ND wrote:
I did & it's $50 more and it didn't appear to do anything different
from the Roku.
it's about $25 more than the roku and does a ton of stuff that roku doesn't --- but I suspect those are features you'd have no need / appetite for.
I don't think the WD is wireless
it's not --- but it's a problem easily solved with a $20.
--
"If you're talking behind my back, you're in a good position to kiss my ass!" -- Brad Parrot, NASCAR crew chief.
--tr
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Roku HD box
- From: CLM in ND
- Re: OT: Roku HD box
- References:
- OT: Roku HD box
- From: CLM in ND
- Re: OT: Roku HD box
- From: Texan_2112
- Re: OT: Roku HD box
- From: CLM in ND
- OT: Roku HD box
- Prev by Date: Re: My craps betting
- Next by Date: Re: Bad news for Harry Reid
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Roku HD box
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Roku HD box
- Index(es):