Re: Why so quiet Octoad?


"Thumper" <jaylsmith@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:r5g296da2q1cd17ve67ceoakc237bouav3@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:06:34 -0700, tom ronson
<theavlv.ronson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Olin Ross wrote:

Angle ahead of Reid 48% to 41%.

jesus christ --- did you even look at the date on the article you cited?
nope --- because it fits your shit. but if you want to know why you
baggers aren't taken seriously you provide the proof.

you're dishonest and disingenuous(or utterly ignorant) --- everything
that makes a bagger a bagger.

The latest poll was just on tv. Reid is 1 point behind, a virtual
dead heat.


So, as I've said all along, the Reps risk not only losing the Nevada seat
(which they should have in the bag due to its utterly devastated economy)
they risk losing to the Senate Majority Leader, their 2nd most hated
electoral demon. It still boggles my mind.

Meanwhile, in Delaware, the Reps nominated a woman who makes Angle look like
a genius, who rails against masturbation and uses campaign contributions to
pay the electric bill at the condo she squats at (she was foreclosed on and
has no actual home address), among other things. This seat was an absolute
lock for the Reps if they had nominated Mike Castle; now even Karl Rove is
calling the woman nutty and she's waaaay behind the Dem.

They could have won the Senate with ease; now with Nevada a tossup and
Delaware leaning heavily Dem, it looks like the Tea Partiers have cost the
Republicans control of that august body.

Pretty funny.

O


.