Re: Danni Goldhabers Visit: Danni won't answer this
- From: "Danni" <danni214@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 21:24:22 -0400
<salmoneous@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1149210947.139867.56190@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You do understant there is a difference between "commenting in depth"
and "freeing David from a vow of silence that makes him look kinda
silly" don't you?
Yes. And David is respecting my request to not discuss the case in depth
either.
What's wrong with letting the man say what he saw in a public document?
David hasn't seen the documents yet.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Danni Goldhabers Visit: Danni won't answer this
- From: salmoneous
- Re: Danni Goldhabers Visit: Danni won't answer this
- From: David Berman
- Re: Danni Goldhabers Visit: Danni won't answer this
- From: normzauchin
- Re: Danni Goldhabers Visit: Danni won't answer this
- References:
- Re: Goldhabers Visit
- From: Little Mikey
- Re: Danni Goldhabers Visit: Danni won't answer this
- From: D H
- Re: Danni Goldhabers Visit: Danni won't answer this
- From: Danni
- Re: Danni Goldhabers Visit: Danni won't answer this
- From: normzauchin
- Re: Danni Goldhabers Visit: Danni won't answer this
- From: Danni
- Re: Danni Goldhabers Visit: Danni won't answer this
- From: salmoneous
- Re: Goldhabers Visit
- Prev by Date: Re: Danni Goldhabers Visit: Danni won't answer this
- Next by Date: Re: Goldhabers Visit
- Previous by thread: Re: Danni Goldhabers Visit: Danni won't answer this
- Next by thread: Re: Danni Goldhabers Visit: Danni won't answer this
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|