Re: Welcome to AVLV Mr. V


Sancho Panza wrote:

Since I promised you just one more post I had to take this quote from
your previous post:

Sancho Panza wrote:
Big-time usenet bully. Small-time know-nothing, by his own words.

I did not ask you to join this discussion. But by doing so you implied
that you would argue within the parameters that the existing
participants laid out. These were not difficult. The debate revolved
around the following statements:

"Gambling coming to AC was a mob thing, which of course is no surprise
to anyone."

"This lays it all out, in particular the involvement of the
Philadelphia
family in the siting and development of casinos in Atlantic City."

You chose to ramble on about totally unrelated subjects, inject total
non sequiturs, and just generally act the fool. Now how you come to the
conclusion that my letting you know that were embarrassing yourself
makes me a bully, I am not sure of. If you enter a debate do you expect
the other person to politely agree even if you are talking gibberish?
As to knowing nothing, I knew enough to prove that you and your friend
were totally full of ***. By my own words? If you can show me some
words of mine to back up your statement I would be quite surprised.

Nothing was cut and pasted. Those are the articles en toto. If you have
something to the contrary, let's see it.

You don't understand what cut and paste means, do you? Ignorance is
nothing to be ashamed of.

OK, tell everyone just what was cut.

Everything from the articles you posted was cut and pasted. You
obviously do not know what the term means. I told you before that
doesn't make you look stupid, just ignorant. The fact that you keep
bringing it up makes you look stupid.
I will give you a hint. Unless you typed those articles, you cut and
pasted them. You can cut and paste a whole article. The term does not
mean that you cut out a part of an article. I am not here to educate
you. Nor am I here to teach you that if you want to debate an issue you
can't keep changing the issue mid debate because you keep getting
proven a moron.

Especially if someone is too arrogant, impatient or otherwise unable to read
three articles and not respond to any of them. Keep up the insults. They
betray just who writes them.

I read your three articles. I thought that would be obvious since I
commented upon them not having any relevance to the discussion. Yes, I
was impatient because after wasting my time reading them I realized how
stupid I was for arguing with an idiot. Not one sentence in that whole
long winded bull*** post of yours had anything to do with the issues
being discussed. I reminded you of those issues at least half a dozen
times and yet you wasted my time by cut and pasting total non
sequiturs. Of course I was pissed and of course I told you exactly what
I thought of your mental masturbation.

Anyway that's it. I am through. Shame on me for wasting my time.

.

Quantcast