Re: Welcome to AVLV Mr. V

You and BOB are like Laurel and Hardy, Abbott and Costello, Martin and
Lewis,

U FERGOT THE MOST REALISTIK DUO, DUMB AND DUMBER...
=SEN0UR TR0UT=




--
Have A Great Day...
"DocTCW" <doctcw@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1141069565.342783.136420@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Norm---

You can't let one disagreement get in the way of a healthy
relationship. I can vouch for V.
He is a stand up guy with a lot to add to the group. Now shake hands
and be friends!

You and BOB are like Laurel and Hardy, Abbott and Costello, Martin and
Lewis, Bush and Clinton. I hate it when you fuss at people! WAWAWA!

Tom
normzauchin wrote:
I will address this post and try to stay civil only out of respect for
Doc.

Mr. V wrote:

As I posted elsewhere, I just ordered the book I'd based my opinion on,
and will get back to you about it with specifics after I read it again.

As I have tried to explain to you over and over again, it does not
really matter what one book says. You can find at least one book that
will make a claim for every crackpot idea on the planet. The fact that
you could not even remember what your "one book" even said just made
you sound that much more dense. The point for the fourth or fifth time
is that if your book cite is correct then there would be numerous other
books and articles, etc., saying the same thing. You cannot seem to
google up any other corroborating evidence to your ridiculous
statements. Out of billions of google bits of info, you cannot find
anyone that agrees with you or your possible remembrance of the facts
of this book. Shouldn't that tell you something?


Just for the record, norm, which casino or casinos in particular would
you like me to focus my analysis on?

What analysis? You want to read one book and if it agrees with your
preconceived notions you want to call that an analysis. So you believe
in flying saucers and you have read at least fifty books claiming alien
abductions does that make it so? There are many books claiming that
their crap systems change the math, does that make it true. You made a
couple of ridiculous statements and cannot back them up, that is a
fact. As to which casinos, I would of course answer any and all of
them.

Which ones do you believe were squeaky clean?

Squeaky clean in what sense? The claim you made was about organized
crime not squeaky clean casinos.

IIRC, you said you were involved in the siting process, so my question
should be a no-brainer for you.

What part of any of my posts would lead you to believe that I was
involved in any siting process? This is your problem and why you and I
cannot have a discussion.


I assume the book is an authoritative source: if you can prove
otherwise, I will gladly concede the point.

Why would you assume the book is an authoritative source when there is
no other source out there who corroborates what you say it says? Why do
I have to prove the negative that it is not an authoritative source?
You made the organized crime hypothesis, now it is up to YOU to prove
it. You cannot, yet you just keep making a fool of yourself.(I am
trying to stay civil Doc, but this guy is like a fucking brick)


But if I establish that you are wrong, will you admit it, or continue
with your fecal painting?

Google up a number of sources agreeing with your Atlantic City casinos
and Organized crime theories and I will read them. If they seem to be
well researched and if various law enforcement agencies FBI, IRS, NJ
State Police agree with your theories then I would have to say that you
are the genius that showed us all.


Time will tell...

It has nothing to do with time, it has to do with the facts. Not one
wacky book that no one including law enforcement thinks is accurate,
but the facts.

Now please, I have no further reason to discuss any subject with you. I
haven't any respect for your powers of logic or reason so I think its
best for you to go to your corner of AVLV and I will go to mine. Oh and
say hello to Mikey and Strevel, you will find them in your
neighborhood.



.

Loading