Re: SouthCoast - review

I don't know if you'll agree with me or not, but I think I have at least
arguable credentials to comment on the subject due to my long history with
Chuck, and due to the beliefs of some -however wrong they are- that I have
enjoyed being in verbal warfare with him.

"normzauchin" <normzauchin@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1136563126.361087.249210@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

CyßerHoG® wrote:

Then you engage the very raison d'etre of this "pack" in a battle of
> usenet wits and are hopelessly overmatched (like everyone else that's ever
> engaged him). And now, you're just "horsing around".

>Hog, I have to disagree with you about the "overmatched" thing. Many
>posters have bested Chuck in the flame arena. Chuck's getting his ass
>kicked is usually evidenced by his CLAIM to have killfiled the
>offending poster.

I believe this is not only true, but I'm puzzled as to why anyone would
think that people engaged in debate with him are hopelessly overmatched. In
fact, his technique, if you want to call it that, is one of very little
originality. Rather, it is one of almost ceaseless redundancy and
repetition, without any serious attempt to vary the message or to show
creativity. It is much closer to the "did not," "did so" of children
repeating the same things over and over until one of them gets tired of the
whole thing. In addition, I think it should be obvious that his incessant
use of obscenities and generally offensive language is not the mark of a
true wit, but rather the refuge of one who decidedly is not a wit at all and
has a serious lack of social graces.

Maybe Hog thinks everyone is overmatched because he thinks it is effective
to relentlessy hammer at something ad nauseum.

>Chuck's other little game he plays when he has had
>his ass kicked is to fabricate complete lies about that poster and then
>demanding the poster prove a negative, that the lies aren't true. Chuck
>is truly not very bright and his techniques are not very sophisticated.

I totally agree. Over the years, there is not a single thing -not one- that
he ever wrote about me, and which I declared was a lie, that he was ever
able to prove, even when I offered to make it financially worth his while.
Even in the one case where I accepted the fact that he "might" be a legal
resident of Las Vegas (at the time), I reached the conclusion via my own
research, not anything he was able to provide.

As time went on and his fabrications became more obvious to me and many
others, due in part to their wildness, it just made it easier to do what I'm
able to do now, which is to mostly ignore him.


>In other words you are making him seem a lot more clever than he is.
>His strengths are that he is not afraid to lie and that he will do what
>ever it takes to try and win what almost everyone else assumes to be an
>inconsequential battle.

You are right again, and that was MY mistake in not treating this stuff as
inconsequential (other than his failed attempt to interfere with my
employment).

But I'm never too old to learn, and I have learned.

>This combined with Chuck's penchant for
>doing exactly what he accuses others of doing and his voracious
>appetite for lying tells me I can draw certain conclusions.

You mean he can be labeled with the "H" word?

>Please Hog, do not misinterpret the above. I think you have every right
>to your opinion and who you like or don't like is your business but
>just for some balance, the next time Chuck says that EE never worked in
>the movie business you may want to ask Chuck how he knows that and if
>he can prove it using headers.

EE HAS worked in the movie business, and I know some of the details. EE
never said he was a bigshot in the business, but he definitely had the
experience. He is also not a wetback ...not even close. But why should we
worry about this when talking about a congenital liar?

--David/NV


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: SouthCoast - review
    ... The Chuck M.O. is to then sit back and take pot shots ... his ass kicked is to fabricate complete lies about that poster and then ... demanding the poster prove a negative, that the lies aren't true. ... inconsequential battle. ...
    (alt.vacation.las-vegas)
  • Re: Jan In Dental Town
    ... > I never saw any poster who claims that everyone lies, except Chuck ... > Zimmerman. ...
    (sci.med.dentistry)
  • Re: pig driteman
    ... > ...sick and tired of your lies and CRAP. ... > a damn about what Chuck P. Adams thinks about anything. ... > The only relvant consideration in a custody hearing is YOUR fitness ... > be admissable as an exception to the hearsay rules...an exception ...
    (sci.med.diseases.lyme)
  • Re: OT- A sincere apology to Budd & the rest of you
    ... >I will never post another reply to Chuck or Mack again. ... >is welcomed to just delight in those lies. ... President, or that we are to stand by the President ...
    (alt.support.diabetes)
  • Re: OT: Ken Lay bites the dust
    ... what is it about Chuck ... most people dislike the same posters that Chuck goes after. ... But what really makes Chuck the vile human being that he is the lying. ... how vicious and mean spirited his lies are. ...
    (alt.vacation.las-vegas)
Loading