Re: SouthCoast - review
- From: "Big Mikey" <mikem4454@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 01:46:03 GMT
I agree with you David, but why piss in the wind?
It proves more about Chuck than he realizes.
Obviouly to write an article as long and detailed as that takes time. And
if Chuck did indeed write it rather than plagiarize it then it shows how
much time this guy has on his hands. He lives his life behind the computer
day and night. Add all the other newgroups he bothers and one can see how
much time he spends.
Now agreed since my arrival back in LV I have also spent a lot of time
posting as well but my spin will end. I got a big ballon my even my ballon
will run out of my hot air.
I have thoroughly enjoyed bothering several of the animals here and
especially all the sock puppets.
David, none of this really matters to any of us does it? And if it does
why? Ace, or Denny or anyone can hate my guts all they want. And I can hate
them right back. But we still pay bills, take a good (hopefully) dump once
a day in the john, eat, sleep (well maybe not Chuck) but you get the point,
David.
I am going to eat with Strevel in the early moring and then head over to
Sands to mess with billb. And nobody loves to mess with me and you like
billb does. And he is damn insecure. But who gives a crap?
Billb will probably have a few laughs with me and then piss on me again next
month. So what?
You always seek truth David, which is why despite our many disagreements is
the glue that makes me always like you. That is the legal scholar in you.
Whatever you write meets immediate acceptance with me. Anything that Chuck
writes meets with my immediate doubt.
And if I ever doublted your sources I am sure you would show them to me.
Enough said.
Big Mikey
"David Berman" <davidinlv@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:2_Zuf.5813$jR.1195@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "normzauchin" <normzauchin@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1136420545.101947.53420@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
> My point this time was not to do the leg work again but to
>> simply comment upon my amazement of how so many intelligent people
>> could be taken in so easily. If I were to show you proof once again I
>> would simply have to go through the same exercise the next time the
>> thief stole someone's intellectual property. As I said the proof is
>> there. I described how simply one can ascertain it.
>
> Since you suggest it would not be a great challenge to establish the fact
> of
> plagiarism in this case, I respectfully suggest it would be a great
> service
> to AVLV if, at least this time, you help along those who are incapable or
> unwilling to do the research and either post the source material or link
> to
> it. Then folks can make their own judgment and, because the purloined
> material would presumably be extensive, it would give many something to
> think about regarding the bestowing of praise.
>
> Please don't think I'm trying to engage in a spitting contest with you. I
> simply think that just as one should not "borrow" from another source and
> present material as one's own instead of giving proper credit, one should
> equally not level a charge of plagiarism without being willing to document
> it. It is demeaning to you, IMHO, to not back up what you claim.
>
> This is not an issue of defending or not defending one poster, but about
> the
> concept of how we report information derived from sources other than
> ourselves.
>
> --David/NV
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SouthCoast - review
- From: BOB
- Re: SouthCoast - review
- References:
- Re: SouthCoast - review
- From: EVIL ELVIS
- Re: SouthCoast - review
- From: normzauchin
- Re: SouthCoast - review
- From: BOB
- Re: SouthCoast - review
- From: David Berman
- Re: SouthCoast - review
- From: normzauchin
- Re: SouthCoast - review
- From: David Berman
- Re: SouthCoast - review
- Prev by Date: Re: Some Pics from Red Rock Canyon
- Next by Date: Re: First Time in Vegas
- Previous by thread: Re: SouthCoast - review
- Next by thread: Re: SouthCoast - review
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|