Re: The speed of the speed of light.
- From: Peter Moylan <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:20:22 +1100
John Holmes wrote:
Peter Moylan wrote:LOL.
J. J. Lodder wrote:
David Hatunen <hatunen@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 12:46:22 +0000, Peter Duncanson (BrE) wrote:
Is a perfect vacuum a perfect vacuum if it has photons in it?No. Photons are mass.
<runs away and hides behind a rock>Why? It's perfectly good question.
The perfectly good answer is that a vacuum is perfect
if the index of refraction of it equals one,
to the available accuracy of measurement.
In other words, if the refractive index is the same as the refractive
index of a vacuum. You test this by putting your vacuum next to the
other vacuum, and see what happens to light as it crosses the
boundary.
[A cat jumps out of a box and chases the spot of light.]
--
Peter Moylan, Newcastle, NSW, Australia. http://www.pmoylan.org
For an e-mail address, see my web page.
.
- References:
- The speed of the speed of light.
- From: Bob G
- Re: The speed of the speed of light.
- From: J. J. Lodder
- Re: The speed of the speed of light.
- From: Snidely
- Re: The speed of the speed of light.
- From: J. J. Lodder
- Re: The speed of the speed of light.
- From: Garrett Wollman
- Re: The speed of the speed of light.
- From: Glenn Knickerbocker
- Re: The speed of the speed of light.
- From: J. J. Lodder
- Re: The speed of the speed of light.
- From: Peter Duncanson (BrE)
- Re: The speed of the speed of light.
- From: J. J. Lodder
- Re: The speed of the speed of light.
- From: Peter Moylan
- Re: The speed of the speed of light.
- From: John Holmes
- The speed of the speed of light.
- Prev by Date: Re: Fowles: there was the door through
- Next by Date: Re: unlike
- Previous by thread: Re: The speed of the speed of light.
- Next by thread: Re: The speed of the speed of light.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|