Re: The New York Times
- From: "Mike Lyle" <mike_lyle_uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:28:01 -0000
Shortie Longfellow wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:22:33 -0000, "Mike Lyle"Bluster? More a cheerful recognition that a sensible response might have
<mike_lyle_uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Shortie Longfellow wrote:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:25:03 -0000, "Mike Lyle"
<mike_lyle_uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Evan Kirshenbaum wrote:
Shortie Longfellow <longshorts@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
That there is a widespread felt need for a more specific name
than the skunked "The Times" seems to be shown by Google's
getting "about 549,000" hits on the phrase "London Times" and
"about 4,300,000" on "The Times of London."
Guilt can't generally be established in a trial by Google, but if
you mean that an awful lot of people are either vague about it or
know that others may be,
There's nothing vague about knowing that people in Los Angeles say
"The Times" when referring to their local paper and knowing that
it's simply not specific enough to say "The Times" when referring
in Los Angeles to the "The Times" published in England. The
vagueness here lies in the British name "The Times" itself, which
has become vague despite any specificity it may have once had.
Language evolves. "Decimate" no longer means only "kill one in
ten," "aggravate" no longer means only "make heavier," and "The
Times" is no longer an adequate sole name for a newspaper.
Well, perhaps Mr Murdoch, as a celebrated nationality-shifter, should
bow to your acknowledged expertise in name-changing.
Bluster. Doesn't respond to my remark sensibly.
been out of keeping with the proposal. After all, you didn't really
expect me to take seriously the idea that the paper should change its
name, did you?
then nobody would argue with you, even without seeing
Google counts. But that would not skunk it in scholarly circles,
where one's yea tends to be one's yea, and one's nay, one's nay.
Looking at Google Books, I see "The Times, of London" back to 1825
and "The _Times_ of London" back to 1833. "The London _Times_"
goes back at least to 1813. (That's the earliest I saw that had a
date I could verify was correct.)
Well, I quite often use the form "the London _Times_" myself:
I seem to remember its having been held here that the proper name of
the newspaper is _The Times_, so wouldn't a truly true scholar say
"the London _The Times_," not "the London _Times_"?
References and body text are not the same creature, and often display
differing stylistic behaviour.
[...]
Bafflegab. If you don't want to answer the question, why don't you
just refrain from posting?
You mean this is a completely serious conversation? Well, in that case,
I'll rephrase my sentiments, as follows. References such as
bibliographies and footnotes should be precise, and use the formal
titles of any publications referred to; such precision is not always
needed in general writing or even in the main body of an academic or
other specialist work. I'll be a little surprised if you disagree with
that. (I might mention that I have never needed to mention the newspaper
in a specialist work.)
Is the name of the paper "The Times" or is it something else?
When you write "I quite often use the form "the London _Times_"
myself," you are implying that the name of the paper is "Times," not
"The Times."
I don't really think so for any everyday context; and I hope I wouldn't
use the form where it was likely to mislead.
--
Mike.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The New York Times
- From: Shortie Longfellow
- Re: The New York Times
- References:
- Re: The New York Times
- From: John Lawler
- Re: The New York Times
- From: Jonathan Morton
- Re: The New York Times
- From: Mike Lyle
- Re: The New York Times
- From: Sydney Sorenson
- Re: The New York Times
- From: Mike Lyle
- Re: The New York Times
- From: Shortie Longfellow
- Re: The New York Times
- From: Evan Kirshenbaum
- Re: The New York Times
- From: Mike Lyle
- Re: The New York Times
- From: Shortie Longfellow
- Re: The New York Times
- From: Mike Lyle
- Re: The New York Times
- From: Shortie Longfellow
- Re: The New York Times
- Prev by Date: Re: Reading the book after watching the film
- Next by Date: Re: Tailgating
- Previous by thread: Re: The New York Times
- Next by thread: Re: The New York Times
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|