Re: "Guy" Threads (Probably OT)
- From: Hatunen <hatunen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 12:48:59 -0700
On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 18:08:39 +0200, Bertel Lund Hansen
<unospamo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Chuck Riggs skrev:
Technology for a purpose interests most engineers, whether they are
male or female, or they wouldn't be engineers.
By "empty technic", do you mean that women are not much interested or
good in, for example, theoretical physics?
No, I don't. I mean that if I start explaining to my daughter(s -
I have two) about the latest changes in the CSS specs for
HTML-pages, they get a very distant look in their eyes, and it
won't be many minutes before they start talking about something
else or find something to do.
Good grief. I'd be doing the same.
--
************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@xxxxxxx) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
.
- References:
- "Guy" Threads (Probably OT)
- From: Maria Conlon
- Re: "Guy" Threads (Probably OT)
- From: Bertel Lund Hansen
- Re: "Guy" Threads (Probably OT)
- From: Chuck Riggs
- Re: "Guy" Threads (Probably OT)
- From: Bertel Lund Hansen
- "Guy" Threads (Probably OT)
- Prev by Date: Re: Please explain a Limerick from the 1950s
- Next by Date: Re: Wingnuts and moonbats
- Previous by thread: Re: "Guy" Threads (Probably OT)
- Next by thread: Re: "Guy" Threads (Probably OT)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
