Re: American semicolons
- From: John Lawler <johnmlawler@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 19:26:07 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 28, 2:43 pm, Joe Fineman <jo...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Vinny Burgoo <hlu...@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
An entertaining article/thread/blogpost/whatever they're called
about Godwin's Law at The Blackboard, a climate blog, includes a
claim that Americans 'only use ";" to separate two things that would
otherwise individually qualify as full sentences'.
I was taught in school, and I think most Americans are, that a
semicolon can be a strong comma as well as weak period. If there ever
was a need for strong commas, it is in the sentence quoted.
*** Now that I think of it, I think you all will enjoy the fact that
this is supposedly one sentence:
It is one sentence.
'With tired, tedious mendacity, it recites the UN’s profitable but
baseless mantra that warming of the world’s climate is “unequivocal”;
that the industries and enterprises of humankind are principally to
blame; and that unless World Government mends our ways the planet is
doomed to an ineluctable cascade of difficulties, disasters,
catastrophes, cataclysms, Armageddons, and apocalypses worthier of St.
John the Divine at his most imaginative than of a businesslike
Elliptical Office facing the real and pressing problems that will
shortly arise from the President’s gleeful, Peronistic
Zimbabweanization of what was once the world’s greatest economy.'
That sort of thing is out of fashion nowadays, and people who attempt
it usually don't do it well. To see it done well, open Gibbon's
_Decline and Fall_ to any page:
The battlements or bastions were shaped in sharp angles; a
ditch, broad and deep, protected the foot of the rampart; and the
archers on the rampart were assisted by military engines: the
_balista_, a powerful cross-bow, which darted short but massy
arrows; the _onagri_, or wild asses, which, on the principle of a
sling, threw stones and bullets of an enormous size.
--
--- Joe Fineman jo...@xxxxxxxxxxx
||: It's not who you know, it's whom. :||
We, yes, it can be a "strong comma", but only in a situation in
which there are a lot of commas already and it's necessary to
distinguish one bunch of comma-related phrases from another.
In that case, the (would-be) comma between them gets brevetted
to a semicolon. But mostly it's used in the way Lewis Thomas
says in his deathless 'Notes on Punctuation'
(http://www.umich.edu/~jlawler/punctuation.html)
"I have grown fond of semicolons in recent years. The semicolon tells
you that there is still some question about the preceding full
sentence; something needs to be added; it reminds you sometimes of the
Greek usage. It is almost always a greater pleasure to come across a
semicolon than a period. The period tells you that that is that; if
you didn't get all the meaning you wanted or expected, anyway you got
all the writer intended to parcel out and now you have to move along.
But with a semicolon there you get a pleasant little feeling of
expectancy; there is more to come; to read on; it will get clearer."
-John Lawler * Linguistics @ umich.edu
"The great thing about human language is that it
prevents us from sticking to the matter at hand."
-- Lewis Thomas
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: American semicolons
- From: Joe Fineman
- Re: American semicolons
- From: R H Draney
- Re: American semicolons
- References:
- American semicolons
- From: Vinny Burgoo
- Re: American semicolons
- From: Joe Fineman
- American semicolons
- Prev by Date: Re: 'comprises of"?
- Next by Date: Re: Do you have 'moors' in the USA and Canada?
- Previous by thread: Re: American semicolons
- Next by thread: Re: American semicolons
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|