Re: Approved of
- From: "CDB" <bellemarec@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:21:21 -0400
James Silverton wrote:
Athel wrote on Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:47:26 +0100:[>> Jens Brix Christiansen wrote:]
Don Phillipson skrev:
"Approved of" would be a solecism.
I think Fowler would have approved of "approved of"?
Do you have any evidence for this assertion? In my experience
people attribute all kinds of opinions to Fowler without
checking what he actually wrote.
There does not seem to be heading for "approve" in the second
edition. Perhaps, it's like the old suspicion that a lot of quoted
statistics are made up on the spur of the moment.
Sheest, all he "asserted" (with a question mark?) was that he
*thought* Fowler *would have* approved.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Approved of
- From: Athel Cornish-Bowden
- Re: Approved of
- References:
- Approved of
- From: Marius Hancu
- Re: Approved of
- From: Don Phillipson
- Re: Approved of
- From: Jens Brix Christiansen
- Re: Approved of
- From: Athel Cornish-Bowden
- Re: Approved of
- From: James Silverton
- Approved of
- Prev by Date: Re: This Week on AUE
- Next by Date: Re: Kick your fenders out
- Previous by thread: Re: Approved of
- Next by thread: Re: Approved of
- Index(es):
Loading