Remembering numbers Was: Thread # 081130-1855Z
- From: "James Silverton" <not.jim.silverton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 14:21:46 -0500
Skitt wrote on Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:52:59 -0800:
Chuck Riggs wrote:"Richard Yates" wrote:Skitt wrote:Bob Cunningham wrote:
No one is advocating numerical thread titles.If you can remember that you were discussing terrorism or asparagus yesterday under a "subject line" reading "shall or will?", why couldn't you remember that you were
discussing it under a "subject line" reading "081130"?
Duh! Long numbers are harder to remember then a few words.
Right. And even when they are not longer, numbers do not
have the nexus of meanings that a few word phrase does that makes it easier to remember. There is overwhelming evidenc
in the psychological literature that meaningful chunks are
more easily remembered than nonsense strings.
For limited values of "no one", obviously.
In another context, that of remembering passwords, nonsense or numerical 10-14 character strings were discussed. I have memorized the 14-digit numerical password for my public library but it was a chore. It seems that best way to get people to use and remember long passwords is to make them pronounceable non-words. Several programs exist to generate them.
--
James Silverton
Potomac, Maryland
Email, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Numbered-lettered subjects. [was: Re: # 081130-1855Z]
- From: Maria C.
- Thread # 081130-1855Z
- From: Bob Cunningham
- Why subject lines like the one this replaces suck [was Re: Thread # 081130-1855Z]
- From: Robert Lieblich
- Thread # 081130-1855Z
- From: Bob Cunningham
- Re: Thread # 081130-1855Z
- From: Skitt
- Re: Thread # 081130-1855Z
- From: Richard Yates
- Re: Thread # 081130-1855Z
- From: Chuck Riggs
- Re: Thread # 081130-1855Z
- From: Skitt
- Numbered-lettered subjects. [was: Re: # 081130-1855Z]
- Prev by Date: Re: Gratuities
- Next by Date: .
- Previous by thread: Re: Thread # 081130-1855Z
- Next by thread: Re: Remembering numbers Was: Thread # 081130-1855Z
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|