Re: OT: wireless headphones
- From: "John Holmes" <seesig@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 23:18:34 +1100
TsuiDF wrote:
On Nov 23, 7:11 pm, John Varela <OLDla...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 06:04:43 -0500, TsuiDF wrote
(in article
<1ff49db1-ef5b-4e68-ab9c-c380cb378...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>):
wireless headphones
Shouldn't that be "cordless" headphones?
I know that "wireless headphones" greatly outGoogles both "cordless
headphones" and "radio headphones"; I'm asking not about what is but
about what should be.
Aha, that's shirley aue and on-topic!
But I confess I don't see much of a difference between 'wires' or
'cords' that the headphones are -less. If I had to differentiate, I'd
imagine a cord to be curly (a la telephone) and a wire to be
straight. But that's not exactly a detailed technical explanation, I
admit.
I think it tends to be "cordless" when you are talking about power transfer and "wireless" when it's more about signal.
Cordless: drills, sanders, kettles, irons, shavers
Wireless: mouse, keyboard, headphones
Not everything follows that rule, though.
--
Regards
John
for mail: my initials plus a u e
at tpg dot com dot au
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: wireless headphones
- From: Roland Hutchinson
- Re: OT: wireless headphones
- References:
- OT: wireless headphones
- From: TsuiDF
- Re: OT: wireless headphones
- From: John Varela
- Re: OT: wireless headphones
- From: TsuiDF
- OT: wireless headphones
- Prev by Date: Re: Accurate prediction
- Next by Date: Re: This is a heck of a note
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: wireless headphones
- Next by thread: Re: OT: wireless headphones
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|