Re: Another pondian difference
- From: Ian Jackson <ianREMOVETHISjackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 21:21:33 +0000
In message <5$fItWQ++HIJFwqR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mike Barnes <mikebarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
In alt.usage.english, J. J. Lodder wrote:No floating object is ever -on- the surface, strictly speaking.
I'd say that the floating object locally depresses the surface, and
remains on it.
From memory, the Water Boatman insect is something actually walks ON the water, on the surface tension layer. It is not wetted by the water, but you can see that it does depress the surface.
However, most things do dip well into the water. According to Archimedes' Principle, "the up-thrust on any body which is fully or partially submerged in a fluid a force equal to the weight of the fluid displaced." [I'm not sure if this law applies to water boatmen, but it probably does.] If the weight of the liquid displaced is insufficient, the body sinks.
Wetting is the contact between a liquid and a solid surface, resulting from intermolecular interactions when the two are brought together. Some things resist this interaction, but a wetting agent can be added to the liquid in order to break down the effects of surface tension, and allow the intimate contact which is necessary for wetting to occur.
Well, that's my 2c worth.
--
Ian
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Another pondian difference
- From: J. J. Lodder
- Re: Another pondian difference
- References:
- Another pondian difference
- From: Steve Hayes
- Re: Another pondian difference
- From: jerry_friedman@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Another pondian difference
- From: Donna Richoux
- Re: Another pondian difference
- From: Default User
- Re: Another pondian difference
- From: Peter Duncanson (BrE)
- Re: Another pondian difference
- From: Mark Brader
- Re: Another pondian difference
- From: Paul Wolff
- Re: Another pondian difference
- From: John Kane
- Re: Another pondian difference
- From: R H Draney
- Re: Another pondian difference
- From: Chuck Riggs
- Re: Another pondian difference
- From: Richard Yates
- Re: Another pondian difference
- From: R H Draney
- Re: Another pondian difference
- From: John Varela
- Re: Another pondian difference
- From: tony cooper
- Re: Another pondian difference
- From: Richard Yates
- Re: Another pondian difference
- From: Pat Durkin
- Re: Another pondian difference
- From: tony cooper
- Re: Another pondian difference
- From: J. J. Lodder
- Re: Another pondian difference
- From: Mike Barnes
- Another pondian difference
- Prev by Date: Re: about "ever"
- Next by Date: Re: concluded in
- Previous by thread: Re: Another pondian difference
- Next by thread: Re: Another pondian difference
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|