If they didn't give up everything
- From: Marius Hancu <NOSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 04:50:58 -0500
Hello:
Would you say that
"there never had been a spiritual life for the rich if they didn't give up everything"
can mean
"there never had been a spiritual life for the rich except in occasions when they gave up everything?"
or:
"there never had been a spiritual life for the rich because they didn't give up everything"
To me, it's ambiguous.
-------
[Robey, a rich, confused guy, wants to write a (confused!) book about rich people and their tribulations in time and why they hadn't really been happy.]
This book, he went on, he wanted to call The Needle's Eye. Because there never had been a spiritual life for the rich if they didn't give up everything. But it wasn't any longer merely the rich who were headed for trouble. In the near future technology was going to create abundance and everyone would have enough of everything. There'd be inequality but not starvation or great need. People would eat. Well, when they ate, what then? The Eden of liberty, plenty, and love, the dream of the French Revolution coming to pass.
Augie March, by Bellow, p. 496
-------
Thanks.
Marius Hancu
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: If they didn't give up everything
- From: Derek Turner
- Re: If they didn't give up everything
- From: Arfur Million
- Re: If they didn't give up everything
- Prev by Date: Re: If they didn't give up everything
- Next by Date: Re: She was as good as telling me that
- Previous by thread: Added to
- Next by thread: Re: If they didn't give up everything
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|