Re: American and British (English)
- From: "Peter Duncanson (BrE)" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 01:41:02 +0100
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 16:49:42 -0700, Hatunen <hatunen@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2008 00:29:25 +0100, "Peter Duncanson (BrE)"
<mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:55:17 -0700, Hatunen <hatunen@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 23:37:47 +0100, "Peter Duncanson (BrE)"You can't find the voltage between any two points without
<mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:05:56 -0700, Hatunen <hatunen@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
Yes you can, but you cannot have current without voltage
difference.
Under normal circumstances. Take a conducting ring, poke a
varying magnetic field through the hole: current will flow
without a potential difference.
And if youc could find the voltage at two points on the ring, you
would find a voltage.
interfering with the current flow, thereby altering the
conditions by, for instance, diverting current out of the
magnetic field into a meter.
Any measurement interferes with the thing being measured. In the
case very small flows one uses a very high impdeance voltmeter to
minimise the interference.
Without such intervention the voltage between any two points is
zero.
So long as a current is flowing it cannot be; Ohm's Law is Ohm's
Law. There are complicating factors such as the inductance of the
ring. Remember you've postulated a varying magnetic field.
I postulated a varying magnetic field because only a varying
magnetic field will induce a current in a conductor.
Ohm's Law applies where current is created by the existence of a
voltage difference.
It does not apply in the same way when the current is created by
induction -- the presence of a varying magnetic field.
Perhaps someone else will follow this up. It's 1:36 am here and
I'm going to bed. I'll be back tomorrow.
P.S. Conventionally, electric current flows from positive to
negative. In the output coil of a generator or transformer it
flows in the opposite direction.
--
Peter Duncanson, UK
(in alt.usage.english)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: American and British (English)
- From: Hatunen
- Re: American and British (English)
- References:
- Re: American and British (English)
- From: Roland Hutchinson
- Re: American and British (English)
- From: Frank ess
- Re: American and British (English)
- From: Purl Gurl
- Re: American and British (English)
- From: J. J. Lodder
- Re: American and British (English)
- From: Purl Gurl
- Re: American and British (English)
- From: Hatunen
- Re: American and British (English)
- From: Peter Duncanson (BrE)
- Re: American and British (English)
- From: Hatunen
- Re: American and British (English)
- From: Peter Duncanson (BrE)
- Re: American and British (English)
- From: Hatunen
- Re: American and British (English)
- Prev by Date: Re: Eentsy Weentsy Spider...
- Next by Date: Re: double jeopardy
- Previous by thread: Re: American and British (English)
- Next by thread: Re: American and British (English)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|