Re: in collaboration with
- From: Roland Hutchinson <my.spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:38:31 -0400
Nick wrote:
Jitze wrote:
>
Unfortunately, Dutch is comparatively rich in these kind of
abbreviations (expressed as the intial letters of a compound
phrase) and they are quite commonly used and widely
understood, but there is no similar habit/tradition in
English. Beyond "i.e." and "e.g." I can't think of anything
comparable - and these two are derived from Latin phrases.
IWO, ISTM that you are saying we don't abbreviate common phrases in
English. IMHO you are only partly right, it depends on the written
English dialect in question, BICBW. HTH, HAND.
W.r.t abbreviations in English, it occurs to me that many of them are used
as professional jargon on in restricted domains of discourse, and will not,
c.p., be understood generally. Often there is no need for them to be
understood outside of a particualr subject area: where else but in a
mathematical argument would you need "wlog"?
--
Roland Hutchinson Will play viola da gamba for food.
NB mail to my.spamtrap [at] verizon.net is heavily filtered to
remove spam. If your message looks like spam I may not see it.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: in collaboration with
- From: Mark Brader
- Re: in collaboration with
- References:
- in collaboration with
- From: Iannis
- Re: in collaboration with
- From: Jitze
- Re: in collaboration with
- From: Nick
- in collaboration with
- Prev by Date: Re: Do not climb the rocketry
- Next by Date: Re: in collaboration with
- Previous by thread: Re: in collaboration with
- Next by thread: Re: in collaboration with
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading