Re: American and British (English)
- From: Hatunen <hatunen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 11:02:19 -0700
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 14:04:56 +0200, nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (J. J.
Lodder) wrote:
Chuck Riggs <chriggs@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 01:24:25 +0000 (UTC), wollman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Garrett Wollman) wrote:
In article <0001HW.C4B8EF6800025E18B01AD9AF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
John Varela <OLDlamps@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As far as I know, the Indians never asked to be Native Americans, it was
paleface do-gooders who hung that on them.
How do you propose we distinguish "Americans descended from people
Columbus mistakenly thought were from India" from "Americans descended
from people who actually were from India"? I don't think "ABD" is
widely known or would be widely used even if it were.
Not to ask a simplistic question, but why are such distinctions
important if we're all Americans?
Needless distinction.
We are all humans,
"American" is a culture, not a species.
For better or worse, though, it appears that much of the world is
trying to be American.
--
************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@xxxxxxx) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: American and British (English)
- From: J. J. Lodder
- Re: American and British (English)
- References:
- Re: American and British (English)
- From: Chuck Riggs
- Re: American and British (English)
- From: John Varela
- Re: American and British (English)
- From: Garrett Wollman
- Re: American and British (English)
- From: Chuck Riggs
- Re: American and British (English)
- From: J. J. Lodder
- Re: American and British (English)
- Prev by Date: Re: American and British (English)
- Next by Date: Re: American and British (English)
- Previous by thread: Re: American and British (English)
- Next by thread: Re: American and British (English)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading