Re: Verb "to tell" without indirect object?
- From: Ruud Harmsen <realemailonsite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 20:56:00 +0200
Mon, 05 May 2008 10:38:58 -0700: Woody Wordpecker
<exw6sxq@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: in alt.usage.english:
Anyway, who did you mean by "we all"?
Native speakers, and non-native speakers who don't have to look
_everything_ up in a grammar book, but just "know" certain things.
Did you find the examples I quoted earlier in the thread, by a Dutch
author hoping to become famous writing in English, correct English?
Idiomatic English? Natural sounding English?
--
Ruud Harmsen
http://rudhar.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Verb "to tell" without indirect object?
- From: Woody Wordpecker
- Re: Verb "to tell" without indirect object?
- References:
- Re: Verb "to tell" without indirect object? (was: Re: "us" for "me" and "f" for "th" in the UK)
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Verb "to tell" without indirect object? (was: Re: "us" for "me" and "f" for "th" in the UK)
- From: Woody Wordpecker
- Re: Verb "to tell" without indirect object? (was: Re: "us" for "me" and "f" for "th" in the UK)
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Verb "to tell" without indirect object? (was: Re: "us" for "me" and "f" for "th" in the UK)
- From: Woody Wordpecker
- Re: Verb "to tell" without indirect object? (was: Re: "us" for "me" and "f" for "th" in the UK)
- From: Ruud Harmsen
- Re: Verb "to tell" without indirect object? (was: Re: "us" for "me" and "f" for "th" in the UK)
- From: Woody Wordpecker
- Re: Verb "to tell" without indirect object? (was: Re: "us" for "me" and "f" for "th" in the UK)
- Prev by Date: Re: Sauerstoff, sauer, Stoff
- Next by Date: Re: A or AN before an abbreviation???
- Previous by thread: Re: Verb "to tell" without indirect object? (was: Re: "us" for "me" and "f" for "th" in the UK)
- Next by thread: Re: Verb "to tell" without indirect object?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|