Re: Coffeeshop etiquette.
- From: R H Draney <dadoctah@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Mar 2008 12:51:20 -0700
John Kane filted:
Paul Wolff wrote:
It was the cyclist's own
impetus that caused all the trouble. I suppose that the gent could be
said to have 'used' gravity, but is gravity excessive? If so, God is in
trouble too, whenever someone falls off the side of a building.
Pushing someone off the side of a building is probably considered a
crime. You could say that the person should not be standing where he can
be pushed but I'd not like to defend that in court even if the person
was a trespasser.
I'm unable to come up with an application of it in the case of the bicycle, but
"failure to act" may actually make it a crime to step out of the path of someone
on a rooftop charging at you....r
--
What good is being an executive if you never get to execute anyone?
.
- References:
- Re: Coffeeshop etiquette.
- From: John Kane
- Re: Coffeeshop etiquette.
- From: the Omrud
- Re: Coffeeshop etiquette.
- From: mUs1Ka
- Re: Coffeeshop etiquette.
- From: Mike Lyle
- Re: Coffeeshop etiquette.
- From: Robert Bannister
- Re: Coffeeshop etiquette.
- From: irwell
- Re: Coffeeshop etiquette.
- From: JF
- Re: Coffeeshop etiquette.
- From: John Kane
- Re: Coffeeshop etiquette.
- From: JF
- Re: Coffeeshop etiquette.
- From: John Kane
- Re: Coffeeshop etiquette.
- From: Paul Wolff
- Re: Coffeeshop etiquette.
- From: John Kane
- Re: Coffeeshop etiquette.
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: new wheels
- Next by Date: Re: Trade vs. Trading
- Previous by thread: Re: Coffeeshop etiquette.
- Next by thread: Re: Coffeeshop etiquette.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|