Re: Ass/arse
- From: tony cooper <tony_cooper213@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 23:00:49 -0500
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 03:33:30 GMT, "Maria C." <noname@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
R H Draney wrote:
Peter Moylan filted:
Robert Bannister wrote:
There must be some evidence: the condom manufacturers didn't startI don't think I've ever seen a box of condoms labelled "small".
making small sizes until they broke into the Asian market. Whether
the sell these sizes to all Asian countries, I wouldn't know,
especially since Asia is such a large place.
Normal marketing practice would seem to dictate "large", "extra
large", and "enormous".
Or "large", "grande" and "venti"....r
Is this size thing a joke? I ask because I had no idea that condoms
would be sold in various sizes. Aren't they "one size fits all"?
The display rack for condoms at the CSV where I get my prescriptions
filled is right next to the prescription counter. While I have not
checked for what range of sizes are available, I have noted that
Trojan offers "Magnum" "Larger Size" condoms.
http://www.condom.com/trojan-magnum.html?gclid=CMKG9MPH8pECFQVylgodnnTgyg
I think that's pure marketing genius. If you wanted to introduce a
brand, and wanted some instant sales, offering a larger size condom
would do the trick.
Now if Trojan wanted to *really* nail a market share, they should make
Magnums 15% *smaller* than standard condoms and advertise them as 15%
larger. Imagine the pride when a guy can say that he tried extra
large condoms but they were too small!
--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ass/arse
- From: Hatunen
- Re: Ass/arse
- References:
- Re: Ass/arse
- From: Peter Moylan
- Re: Ass/arse
- From: R H Draney
- Re: Ass/arse
- From: Maria C.
- Re: Ass/arse
- Prev by Date: Re: Computer pain
- Next by Date: Re: Computer pain
- Previous by thread: Re: Ass/arse
- Next by thread: Re: Ass/arse
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|