Re: On a daily basis
- From: Nick <1-nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:52:42 +0000
Don Aitken wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:19:29 +0000, Nick
<1-nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
lyricaljohnnny@xxxxxxxxx wrote:I hear this misused daily.The general use of "on an x basis" to mean "every x" or "once an x" is a bugbear of mine.
As an accountant, I may calculate interest on a daily basis, but I
would probably do it once a year.
I don't read aue "on a daily basis", I do it daily. But you try getting anyone who writes businessese to say that.
Its popularity seems to be a fairly recent development. Gowers,
writing in the 1940s, has a section on the misuse of "basis", but is
mild in his treatment of this usage; "You may well allow it to stand
if you have written of staff paid on a weekly basis or of a house let
on a monthly basis, but do not despise 'by the week' or 'by the month'
as somewhat less pompos alternatives". He follows this with a list of
examples "which would not escape so easily".
And Gowers is attacking a lesser sin. His examples are the ones our accountant would accept as a technical term: where the unit of measurement is that period of time, so the payments are based on the week or the month - so rent is not just payable every week, but also for one week at a time. Today's users of the term don't even mean that much.
I have a rather nice copy of the Complete Plain Words, ex libris HMG, and do wonder that they can afford to have let it go.
.
- References:
- On a daily basis
- From: lyricaljohnnny
- Re: On a daily basis
- From: Nick
- Re: On a daily basis
- From: Don Aitken
- On a daily basis
- Prev by Date: Re: Brussels boink
- Next by Date: Re: Computer pain
- Previous by thread: Re: On a daily basis
- Next by thread: Re: On a daily basis
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|