Re: Fings we was lernt rong in skool
- From: Hatunen <hatunen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:56:42 -0700
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:54:00 +0000, Vinny Burgoo
<hlunnh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In alt.usage.english, Hatunen wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 18:12:19 +0000, Vinny Burgoo
One reason why economists shouldn't worry too much about our children's
children is that, no matter what economists do, our children's children
are likelier to be wealthier than we are and thus better able to solve
their own problems.
Well, so far that's been a fair assumption. So far.
Apart from during major wars and epidemics, has the contrary been true
at any stage in the last ... forever?
--
************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@xxxxxxx) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
.
- References:
- Re: Fings we was lernt rong in skool
- From: Robert Bannister
- Re: Fings we was lernt rong in skool
- From: JF
- Re: Fings we was lernt rong in skool
- From: Maria
- Re: Fings we was lernt rong in skool
- From: Fred Springer
- Re: Fings we was lernt rong in skool
- From: Percival P. Cassidy
- Re: Fings we was lernt rong in skool
- From: Fred Springer
- Re: Fings we was lernt rong in skool
- From: Donna Richoux
- Re: Fings we was lernt rong in skool
- From: Mike Page
- Re: Fings we was lernt rong in skool
- From: Vinny Burgoo
- Re: Fings we was lernt rong in skool
- From: Hatunen
- Re: Fings we was lernt rong in skool
- From: Vinny Burgoo
- Re: Fings we was lernt rong in skool
- Prev by Date: Re: Misnomers -- Do they actually exist?
- Next by Date: Re: Grammar question on back of grammar book that I can't find answered by author anywhere inside the book.
- Previous by thread: Re: Fings we was lernt rong in skool
- Next by thread: Re: Fings we was lernt rong in skool
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
