Re: PC folk etymologies, contd. [was: What kind of change?]
- From: Hatunen <hatunen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 09:40:46 -0700
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 07:51:28 -0800, Bob Cunningham
<exw6sxq@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 08:16:11 -0700, Hatunen
<hatunen@xxxxxxx> said:
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 23:23:11 -0800, Bob Cunningham
<exw6sxq@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 19:25:01 -0700, Hatunen
<hatunen@xxxxxxx> said:
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 15:40:07 -0800, Bob Cunningham
<exw6sxq@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 19:41:30 +0200, "Father Ignatius"
<FatherIgnatius@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
(in a signature)
"I don't in general care much what people say about me or
about my posts."
---Bob Cunningham
I find it hard to believe I really said "posts". I would
normally say "postings".
Why do you care?
I think I see your intended point, but what I care about
what I said has nothing to do with what I might care about
what someone else said.
I'm assuming that Iggy Ignatius wouldn't quote a thing like
that without taking care to see it was quoted accurately.
It seems a peculiar apolgy for someone who also said, "I don't in
general care much what people say about me or about my posts."
Apology? I don't see anything that even remotely resembles
an apology. Where do you think there's an apology?
That's the way I took 'I find it hard to believe I really said
"posts". I would normally say "postings".'
Anyway, I was being ironic--in the British sense, not the O
Henry sense. Until I look up and see for myself that I said
"posts" instead of "postings", I won't believe I did.
And what I said about Iggy quoting accurately was also
irony. He actually is skilled at quoting out of context to
create a misleading impression. That's the worst kind of
inaccuracy. I would never seriously credit Iggy with
quoting accurately.
Maybe there's something to what some UK posters have said
about us: Americans don't understand irony.
I do understand irony. Stop being so defensive; it was your irony
I was pointing out to Wordpecker who is the one who didn't get
it.
I think you need to reconstruct the thread.
--
************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@xxxxxxx) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PC folk etymologies, contd. [was: What kind of change?]
- From: Bob Cunningham
- Re: PC folk etymologies, contd. [was: What kind of change?]
- References:
- Re: What kind of change?
- From: tony cooper
- Re: What kind of change?
- From: Jitze
- Re: What kind of change?
- From: tony cooper
- Re: What kind of change?
- From: Default User
- PC folk etymologies, contd. [was: What kind of change?]
- From: Father Ignatius
- Re: PC folk etymologies, contd. [was: What kind of change?]
- From: Bob Cunningham
- Re: PC folk etymologies, contd. [was: What kind of change?]
- From: Hatunen
- Re: PC folk etymologies, contd. [was: What kind of change?]
- From: Bob Cunningham
- Re: PC folk etymologies, contd. [was: What kind of change?]
- From: Hatunen
- Re: PC folk etymologies, contd. [was: What kind of change?]
- From: Bob Cunningham
- Re: What kind of change?
- Prev by Date: Re: PC folk etymologies, contd. [was: What kind of change?]
- Next by Date: Re: Obligatory beauty maintenance (mostly OT)
- Previous by thread: Re: PC folk etymologies, contd. [was: What kind of change?]
- Next by thread: Re: PC folk etymologies, contd. [was: What kind of change?]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|