Re: Traffic light bell
- From: Jeffrey Turner <jturner@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 13:43:07 -0500
Peter Moylan wrote:
On 23/11/07 16:43, Skitt wrote:Father Ignatius wrote:
I recall no distinction in sound between changing to red and changing to blue, and took the sound to be simply an attention-getter.
There was no difference in sound, and there was no blue. Just red
and green panels with GO and STOP written vertically. They sort of
rotated around a vertical axis, in a stepwise fashion.
Some of the early traffic "lights" in Melbourne were like clock faces,
with a single hand travelling through the green, amber, and red
sections. This allowed you to work out how long you still had to wait.
Today's Australian pedestrian crossings make a slow "tick, tick" sound
after you've pushed the request button. Once you're allowed to cross, the
sound changes to a frantic rattle.
In Washington, DC, there's a clock that counts down the seconds to the
changes of walk/don't walk on every pole with the w/dw sign.
--Jeff
--
"Power never concedes anything without a
demand. It never has and it never will."
--Frederick Douglass
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Traffic light bell
- From: Mark Brader
- Re: Traffic light bell
- From: John O'Flaherty
- Re: Traffic light bell
- References:
- Traffic light bell
- From: tony cooper
- Re: Traffic light bell
- From: Skitt
- Re: Traffic light bell
- From: Father Ignatius
- Re: Traffic light bell
- From: Skitt
- Re: Traffic light bell
- From: Peter Moylan
- Traffic light bell
- Prev by Date: Re: Overwrought metal hamsters
- Next by Date: Re: It pays to improve your word power
- Previous by thread: Re: Traffic light bell
- Next by thread: Re: Traffic light bell
- Index(es):
Loading