Nested parentheses
- From: J de Boyne Pollard <j.deboynepollard@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 05:05:04 -0800 (PST)
PJ> (And can we have a ruling on nested parentheses (like in my
example)
PJ> being ungrammatical or not?)
ACB> I don't find it objectionable. I sometimes nest one parenthesis
inside
ACB> another, but not usually more than that.
If one can reasonably nest quotation marks, one can reasonably nest
parentheses. (Unfortunately, unlike the case with quotation marks,
where British editors, at least, have always had the choice of
employing a progression from single to double marks to indicate the
level of nesting, there isn't a similar choice of single or double
marks for parentheses. [Square brackets can be used, of course. But
they aren't clearly double marks.])
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Nested parentheses
- From: Athel Cornish-Bowden
- Re: Nested parentheses
- From: R H Draney
- Re: Nested parentheses
- References:
- maximum number of directors
- From: KS
- Re: maximum number of directors
- From: Prai Jei
- Re: maximum number of directors
- From: John O'Flaherty
- Re: maximum number of directors
- From: Prai Jei
- Re: maximum number of directors
- From: Athel Cornish-Bowden
- maximum number of directors
- Prev by Date: Re: told a news conference
- Next by Date: Re: The demise of British English
- Previous by thread: Re: maximum number of directors
- Next by thread: Re: Nested parentheses
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|