Re: The Dreaded Spelling Category
- From: John O'Flaherty <quiasmox@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:15:29 -0500
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:19:54 -0700, Bob Cunningham
<exw6sxq@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 23:17:25 -0400, Robert Lieblich
<r_s_lieblich@xxxxxxxxx> said:
One of the categories on tonight's Jeopardy: "The Scintallating 17th
Century." Yes, "scintAllating." It wasn't a pun, and it didn't have
anything to do with the questions and answers. Just a misspelling.
I wonder if Alex will issue a correction on "tomorrow"'s show.
I didn't notice it. Maybe Alex didn't.
I was probably preoccupied with wondering what was imagined
to be scintillating about the 17th century, or what play on
words might be intended. As many of us probably know, the
designers of the clues try hard to come up with clever
wordplay in the category labels. I don't sense any in "The
Scintillating 17th Century", but that doesn't mean it isn't
there.
By the way, "as many of us probably know" is yet another
example of an idiomatic expression that doesn't really say
what it means. It assigns the probability to the knowing,
while the understood meaning is that the probability goes
with the number of people. It would be more logically
accurate to say "as probably many of us know", but I doubt
that a lot of speakers would say it that way.
I see your point. Still, "probably" tends to get distributed. The
phrase "many of us" introduces a probabilistic element to start with.
Of each individual from the original "us", knowing nothing else about
them, it could be said that they "probably know".
--
John
.
- References:
- The Dreaded Spelling Category
- From: Robert Lieblich
- Re: The Dreaded Spelling Category
- From: Bob Cunningham
- The Dreaded Spelling Category
- Prev by Date: Re: How much is that in real money?
- Next by Date: Re: How much is that in real money?
- Previous by thread: Re: The Dreaded Spelling Category
- Next by thread: Re: The Dreaded Spelling Category
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading