Re: Great second cousin?
- From: Oleg Lego <rat@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 15:39:13 -0600
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 11:01:01 -0700, Skitt posted:
Oleg Lego wrote:
Skitt posted:
I, obviously, have problems naming vowels, but short is definitely
not what I'd call the "a" in "father". In Latvian, that letter
would get a macron, indicating that it is long in duration.
Ahh. Hmmm... when I say "short vowel", I refer to the sound of the
vowel, not its duration.
Vowel long short
A hate hat
E seed led
I hire sit
O hole cot
U too hut
You are using the linguists' jargon. I use the regular English meaning, and
I apply it to a vowel that sounds the same whether it is short or long in
duration. That's why I keep adding "in
It's not really linguists jargon. It's rather standard English to
refer to a vowel as long or short, and mean what I showed in the table
above. If I wanted to indicate long or short duration, I might use
"drawn out", or "cut short", but every school child is taught the long
and short of vowels as I showed them, before the age of, say, 8 or 9.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Great second cousin?
- From: Skitt
- Re: Great second cousin?
- References:
- Re: Great second cousin?
- From: Skitt
- Re: Great second cousin?
- From: Oleg Lego
- Re: Great second cousin?
- From: Skitt
- Re: Great second cousin?
- From: Oleg Lego
- Re: Great second cousin?
- From: Skitt
- Re: Great second cousin?
- Prev by Date: Re: Great second cousin?
- Next by Date: Re: English immortality imminent, says top boffin, says Channel 4
- Previous by thread: Re: Great second cousin?
- Next by thread: Re: Great second cousin?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|