Re: White Coat Day
- From: nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (J. J. Lodder)
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:59:14 +0200
<blmblm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1hzy2hx.j8lj4a1qq9qb6N@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
J. J. Lodder <jjlxa31@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[ snip ]
Finally America was forced to become 'good',
not of it's own accord,
but only because Hitler was fool enough
to declare war on them,
(after Pearl Harbor)
Leaving in just enough to make my point, I think ....:
When I view your posts (using a fixed-width font, and software
that doesn't try to reflow paragraphs), they show up with lines
of varying lengths, with line breaks where I imagine you having
(metaphorically?) paused for breath. The effect is weirdly
charming -- your posts appear to be a kind of free verse -- but
I'm really curious about whether this is deliberate on your part,
or an artifact of your newsreader (i.e., what you see when you're
composing your posts is different), or what.
It's not an artifact.
(I'm also mildly curious whether others out there are seeing
something different. For me, the part of the post I quoted
has five lines, respectively beginning "Finally", "not", "but",
"to declare", and "(after".)
Others should see the same,
Jan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: White Coat Day
- From: Mike Lyle
- Re: White Coat Day
- References:
- White Coat Day
- From: Richard Maurer
- Re: White Coat Day
- From: Roland Hutchinson
- Re: White Coat Day
- From: tony cooper
- Re: White Coat Day
- From: Mike M
- Re: White Coat Day
- From: Oleg Lego
- Re: White Coat Day
- From: Peter Moylan
- Re: White Coat Day
- From: J. J. Lodder
- Re: White Coat Day
- From: blmblm
- White Coat Day
- Prev by Date: Re: To "i.e." or not "i.e."?
- Next by Date: Re: A rosé by any other name
- Previous by thread: Re: White Coat Day
- Next by thread: Re: White Coat Day
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|