Re: Another preposition question with "on"
- From: Nick Atty <1-nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 08:38:49 +0100
On 19 May 2007 23:35:53 -0700, Dominic Bojarski
<dominicbojarski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 20, 6:33 am, "John" <agard2...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
An author wrote "He was born on May 25, 1725."
I changed it to "He was born May 25, 1725."
The author didn't like it, and insisted that I change it back, which I
did.
Which way is better?
--
Remove letters in caps from email address before replying
Six of one, half dozen of the other. Both are perfectly standard and
very common. I don't know whether one is more common than the other.
Maybe the version with "on" predominates in writing, and the version
without "on" predominates in speaking, but that's only a tentative,
and probably unjustified, guess. There may be some regional and age
tendencies as well.
I use the version with "on", but that is purely a matter of personal
taste and habit.
As I commented in another thread, on the UK side of the Atlantic the
"on" is pretty well compulsory. We are exposed to the onless form
through US writing, but it still makes us go "eh?" when we come across
it.
--
On-line canal route planner: http://www.canalplan.org.uk
(Waterways World site of the month, April 2001)
My Reply-To address *is* valid, though likely to die soon
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Another preposition question with "on"
- From: John Kane
- Re: Another preposition question with "on"
- From: contrex
- Re: Another preposition question with "on"
- From: Dominic Bojarski
- Re: Another preposition question with "on"
- References:
- Another preposition question with "on"
- From: John
- Re: Another preposition question with "on"
- From: Dominic Bojarski
- Another preposition question with "on"
- Prev by Date: Re: One sentence
- Next by Date: Re: Latest AUE Boink! - We Hate Purl Gurl
- Previous by thread: Re: Another preposition question with "on"
- Next by thread: Re: Another preposition question with "on"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading