Re: train direction
- From: "athel...@yahoo" <athel_cb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 15 Sep 2006 06:19:26 -0700
dontbother wrote:
[ ... ]
The BMJ (British Medical Journal)
group allows authors to begin sentences thus: "27 of the mice died
within 3 h." That's unheard of in American medical journals and in
almost every other self-respecting medical and professional journal I'm
aware of.
You are right about American publications, and the Chicago Guide agrees
with you: "When a number begins a sentence it is always spelled out
(rule 9.5)", but the only pretence at a reason is that it is supposed
to avoid awkwardness. They suggest
One hundred and ten candidates were accepted
or
In all, 110 candidates were accepted
Personally I find the first version tedious to write and awkward to
read.
I've long been conscious that American editors have a horror of numbers
at the beginnings of sentences, but I've never understood why: what's
supposed to be wrong with them?
Incidentally, the Amazon.com web site doesn't follow this usage: it
cheerfully puts things like "3 of 3 people found the following review
helpful". Do you cringe when you see that, or is it OK on the computer
screen, but not on paper?
a.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: train direction
- From: dontbother
- Re: train direction
- References:
- train direction
- From: pinko
- Re: train direction
- From: Mark Brader
- Re: train direction
- From: pinko
- Re: train direction
- From: dontbother
- train direction
- Prev by Date: Re: How should it be read?
- Next by Date: Re: Pronunciation of "Davies"
- Previous by thread: Re: train direction
- Next by thread: Re: train direction
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|