Re: "and me" vs. "and I"

Mike Lyle wrote:
Skitt wrote:
The Grammer Genious wrote:

[...]
Rather, they are currently considered ungrammatical according to the
grammar in current favor. They are perfectly grammatical in other
grammars in widespread use by educated native speakers.

Well, there are several degrees of being educated. Some are more so
than others, y'know.

GG is making a political statement in the belief that it's a
linguistic one. If his interest had genuinely been in the language
issue, he would have offered the OP some usable advice.

Oh, I know. I don't pay much mind to GG's offerings, but there are times when a comment seems appropriate.
--
Skitt (in Hayward, California)
http://www.geocities.com/opus731/

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: "and me" vs. "and I"
    ... Skitt wrote: ... grammar in current favor. ... grammars in widespread use by educated native speakers. ...
    (alt.usage.english)
  • Re: question for the pure
    ... > Mike Lyle wrote: ... >> Wordsmith wrote: ... >>> Both sentences are grammatically correct, ... That's not style, it's grammar. ...
    (alt.usage.english)
  • Re: "and me" vs. "and I"
    ... Can anyone clarify for me please? ... unfortunately, very common. ... grammar in current favor. ... grammars in widespread use by educated native speakers. ...
    (alt.usage.english)