Re: "and me" vs. "and I"
- From: "The Grammer Genious" <waupecong@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:19:25 GMT
"Steve MacGregor" <esperantujo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1157043808.191065.33610@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tommo wrote:
But I have heard a few examples recently of statements not following
this format. Can anyone clarify for me please?
Statements not using this format are ungrammatical, and unfortunately,
very common.
Rather, they are currently considered ungrammatical according to the grammar
in current favor. They are perfectly grammatical in other grammars in
widespread use by educated native speakers.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "and me" vs. "and I"
- From: Skitt
- Re: "and me" vs. "and I"
- From: Mike Lyle
- Re: "and me" vs. "and I"
- References:
- "and me" vs. "and I"
- From: Tommo
- Re: "and me" vs. "and I"
- From: Steve MacGregor
- "and me" vs. "and I"
- Prev by Date: Re: "Poor in spirit" [Was:Re: traduttore traditore]
- Next by Date: Re: names for language courses
- Previous by thread: Re: "and me" vs. "and I"
- Next by thread: Re: "and me" vs. "and I"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
