Re: prodigious vs. prolific
- From: "Skitt" <skitt99@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 18:50:40 -0700
Stephen Calder wrote:
UC wrote:Stephen Calder wrote:
He's not even correct about what the OED says.
The OED, second edition, has two enties for 'fun': noun and verb.
Show me otherwise.
Go back and read it again. I have the compact edition (1989) and it
takes some trouble to get it out. You have to use the magnifying glass
to read it.
I checked it before writing the above post and it clearly shows the
attributive or adjectival use with citations dating back to 1846.
So does MWCD10.
--
Skitt (in Hayward, California)
http://www.geocities.com/opus731/
.
- References:
- prodigious vs. prolific
- From: sygsix
- Re: prodigious vs. prolific
- From: Lars Eighner
- Re: prodigious vs. prolific
- From: sygsix
- Re: prodigious vs. prolific
- From: athel...@yahoo
- Re: prodigious vs. prolific
- From: sygsix
- Re: prodigious vs. prolific
- From: UC
- Re: prodigious vs. prolific
- From: sygsix
- Re: prodigious vs. prolific
- From: UC
- Re: prodigious vs. prolific
- From: Pat Durkin
- Re: prodigious vs. prolific
- From: UC
- Re: prodigious vs. prolific
- From: Pat Durkin
- Re: prodigious vs. prolific
- From: Stephen Calder
- Re: prodigious vs. prolific
- From: UC
- Re: prodigious vs. prolific
- From: Stephen Calder
- prodigious vs. prolific
- Prev by Date: Re: Submitted for your Approval
- Next by Date: Re: prodigious vs. prolific
- Previous by thread: Re: prodigious vs. prolific
- Next by thread: Re: prodigious vs. prolific
- Index(es):