Re: none
- From: "mb" <azythos2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 Jul 2006 07:54:30 -0700
Tony Cooper wrote:
On 11 Jul 2006 13:24:18 -0700, "mb" <azythos2@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Point is, it comes from a teacher. Even if the teacher had the same
vernacular as yourself, it[1] is supposed to teach standard, written
English.
I dunno. Yes, the EFL teacher teaches standard English. But if his
pupils have any curiosity, do any outside reading, or are exposed to
movies and television, the teacher is going to get questions about
idiomatic usages.
The things his pupils read and see outside of the class are not going
to all be examples of standard English. I can't see a good teacher
ducking questions about non-standard usage.
Of course not. It [1] is supposed, however, to first make sure that the
form, as they say, enshrined in print is first established before local
variants are offered, tagged as such. Especially because we're talking
ESL, not EFL.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: none
- From: Tony Cooper
- Re: none
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: PG = RL?
- Next by Date: Re: Why do some languages have a progressive verb form and some not?
- Previous by thread: Re: none
- Next by thread: Re: none
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading