Re: Arse and ass (was: Yanks only half as good)
- From: Steve Hayes <hayesmstw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 11:55:25 +0200
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:20:35 +0000 (UTC), ijdavis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(Ian Davis) wrote:
I would argue that the difference between ass and arse was sufficient
to warrant different spellings of these two words. Worse it is common
to call someone an ass in english if they behave in a stupid manner.
"Don't make an ass of yourself" might be confusing to the uninitiated.
Yes, it is something to which an AmE speaker might take more umbrage -- the
reverse is the case with "fanny" and "booger", which are more innocuous in the
USA than elsewhere.
--
Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/7734/stevesig.htm
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk
.
- References:
- Re: Arse and ass (was: Yanks only half as good)
- From: Stephen Calder
- Re: Arse and ass (was: Yanks only half as good)
- From: Oleg Lego
- Re: Arse and ass (was: Yanks only half as good)
- From: Ian Davis
- Re: Arse and ass (was: Yanks only half as good)
- Prev by Date: Re: What's a love chair
- Next by Date: Re: Does 'Beer has water in it' imply that all beer has water in it?
- Previous by thread: Re: Arse and ass
- Next by thread: Re: Arse and ass (was: Yanks only half as good)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading