Re: OT: why not shellfish? [Was:Re: Fish & Nut Analogy]
- From: Peter Moylan <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 23:25:19 +1000
Wood Avens wrote:
Birds must fly? Not a lot of flying chickens around these parts.
They can fly if they want to, at least for short distances. In my
experience, the typical backyard chook house has perches a metre or two
above ground level, and the birds have to fly up to them before
settling down for the night.
--
Peter Moylan http://www.pmoylan.org
Please note the changed e-mail and web addresses. The domain
eepjm.newcastle.edu.au no longer exists, and I can no longer
reliably receive mail at my newcastle.edu.au addresses.
The optusnet address still has about 2 months of life left.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Fish & Nut Analogy
- From: Wordsmith
- Re: Fish & Nut Analogy
- From: dontbother
- Re: Fish & Nut Analogy
- From: Neil Gerace
- OT: why not shellfish? [Was:Re: Fish & Nut Analogy]
- From: Mike Lyle
- Re: OT: why not shellfish? [Was:Re: Fish & Nut Analogy]
- From: don groves
- Re: OT: why not shellfish? [Was:Re: Fish & Nut Analogy]
- From: don groves
- Re: OT: why not shellfish? [Was:Re: Fish & Nut Analogy]
- From: Wood Avens
- Fish & Nut Analogy
- Prev by Date: Re: Flagellation
- Next by Date: Re: What's an accident?
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: why not shellfish? [Was:Re: Fish & Nut Analogy]
- Next by thread: Re: OT: why not shellfish? [Was:Re: Fish & Nut Analogy]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|