Re: hello.

THE Entity wrote:

On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:04:14 +1000, Stephen Calder
<calder9nospam@xxxxxxxxx> wrought:


JF wrote:

X-No-Archive: yes

In message <e26opb0rad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, R H Draney <dadoctah@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes


JF filted:


In message <1145465532.750409.46560@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kitty
<kittenfalks1@xxxxxxxxx> writes


you all think its funny but its not!


Google-groups user, Says it all.


Take note, kitty: Published Novelist has provided you here an excellent
illustration of the importance of punctuation...the sentence above is true, but
with its comma removed becomes an obvious falsehood....r


This from a nit-picking, navel-fluff-contemplating, jealousy-wracked unpublished wankstain who likes riding on my illustrious train because he has no talent of his own to train, who doesn't know how many full stops make up a commonly perceived length for a sensible elision; who doesn't know that names, even initials, deserve capitalisation; and who doesn't appear to understand that signature files should be separated from body text by a white line/double en-dash/single space/return separator.

Feeding on my typos will keep him waddling and gobbling among the turkeys where he belongs whereas learning from my wit might give him the ability to soar with eagles.


Check your blood pressure, take your meds. You're too young to hate.


It's also probably the first case in recorded AUE history of anyone
being riled by RH (as he may now unambiguously be known).

Why not let it go, lads? There are far better targets for RH's barbs
(misdirected here, anyway; JF really is the only first-division
"published author" I've ever seen hanging out here for more than a
microsecond) and JF's maledicting (misdirected here, anyway; RH is
arguably of the very last regular poster worthy of being accused of
having "no talent") than each other.

I think I'm safe in saying that most people get a great deal out
pleasure out of reading the posts of both of them. I hope expecting
things to stay that way isn't too much to hope for.



I thought that the soubriquet Published Author was a respectful tease (I'd be quite delighted to be thus referred to!) and I had hoped that James had taken it that way. I read James' post and thought he was just practising some mid-week invective on the nearest target, without real malice. I hope that's the case: r is the last person to attract opprobrium in my opinion, even though his posts are more likely to set off STS than most others. His wit and humour are greatly valued by this poster.


--
Laura
(emulate St. George for email)

www.laurieengelfund.org
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Finding large primes, quickly
    ... My mistake, apologies to James. ... posters have a field day. ... Kind of why politics in other areas disintegrates so rapidly, ... Almost every one of your posts has political ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Newbie
    ... many times seen people make the bogus claim that debuggers ... Rest assured that James has already seen the example I provided, ... Yet the predicament these fake killfilers usually face ... is that my posts are often conclusive in terms of evidence and facts, ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: JSH: Sabotage!
    ... revealing himself when he ... systematically down rated all of my posts. ... Rupert mentioned that James refused to let him join. ... if you didn't have to be a member to post there, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Why cross-posts in discernment are necessary for SRQ to revive
    ... credentials are shown to be real, you will have no more argument from ... Metorological posts have nothing to do with morality. ... IOW nobody cares. ... JAMES WAS AN ESSENE. ...
    (soc.religion.quaker)
  • Re: JSH: Your funeral
    ... I fear that James has discovered The Secret: ... of his posts that I've read over the years, ... There are contexts where this is at least arguable, ... various aspects of our society that are taken ...
    (sci.math)
Loading