Re: multiple adjectives & prosody
- From: Don Aitken <don-aitken@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 23:41:24 +0100
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 22:30:00 +0100, "Mike Lyle"
<mike_lyle_uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
R J Valentine wrote:Wow, indeed. We got rid of that in 1967.
[...]
not for personal profit -- suppose a big corporation like the folks
who inspired that flexible verb "google" were to conspire among
themselves and with others to violate my copyright (which starts out
at something like
five years in prison and a $250,000 fine), does that conspiracy make
it a felony?
You folks still distinguish felony from misdemeanour? Wow!
Conspiracy here in Magna-Carted UK consists in absolutely anything a
prosecuting authority wants it to consist in, whether in itself criminal
or not, unless there have been some long-overdue changes.
There have. There are now only three kinds of criminal conspiracy:
1. To commit a criminal offence
2. To defraud
and (I know you'll like this one)
3. To corrupt public morals or outrage public deceny.
--
Don Aitken
Mail to the From: address is not read.
To email me, substitute "clara.co.uk" for "freeuk.com"
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Felony and misdemeanor (was: multiple adjectives & prosody) (!)
- From: Mark Brader
- Felony and misdemeanor (was: multiple adjectives & prosody) (!)
- References:
- multiple adjectives & prosody
- From: Bob Cunningham
- Re: multiple adjectives & prosody
- From: R J Valentine
- Re: multiple adjectives & prosody
- From: Mike Lyle
- multiple adjectives & prosody
- Prev by Date: Re: mealies
- Next by Date: Re: Teaching English
- Previous by thread: Re: multiple adjectives & prosody
- Next by thread: Re: multiple adjectives & prosody
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|