Re: One Word?
- From: "Raymond S. Wise" <mplsray@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 8 Mar 2006 17:26:07 -0800
Donna Richoux wrote:
the Omrud <usenet.omrud@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Seán O'Leathlóbhair <jwlawler@xxxxxxxxx> had it:
the Omrud wrote:
ray o'hara <roh@xxxxxxxxxxx> had it:
Why do so many posters want to reduce things to one word?
Perhaps they are trying to translate a single word from their own
language and assume that there must be a single English word to which
it corresponds.
I have also often wondered about the: "Is there a word that means (3000
word phrase)?" threads. I wonder why people want and expect such
words. Also, if they don't know the word, will anyone else understand
it anyway?
Some may be from non-native speakers who have such a word in their own
languages but often the requester appears to be a native English
speaker. I sometimes feel that they want the word to sound clever.
For example, "ennui" is much more impressive than boredom.
I didn't realised we were allowed to offer French words. That might
make it more interesting.
As they say, "the French have a word for it."
For the record, MWCD11 gives for "ennui" the date of first attribution
in English as 1732.
Now, as a formula for reacting to someone sneezing,
"Gesundheit!"--which MWCD11 dates in English to 1914--beats the French
formula of "à tes souhaits"/"à vos souhaits" (an idiom which
translates literally as "to your wishes").
--
Raymond S. Wise
Minneapolis, Minnesota USA
E-mail: mplsray @ yahoo . com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: One Word?
- From: Peter Moylan
- Re: One Word?
- References:
- One Word?
- From: ray o'hara
- Re: One Word?
- From: the Omrud
- Re: One Word?
- From: Seán O'Leathlóbhair
- Re: One Word?
- From: the Omrud
- Re: One Word?
- From: Donna Richoux
- One Word?
- Prev by Date: Re: One Word?
- Next by Date: Re: Hope this is a right decision for/from A?
- Previous by thread: Re: One Word?
- Next by thread: Re: One Word?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|