Re: Terrified of [was Re: Regret the error]
- From: Wood Avens <woodavens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 18:45:05 +0000
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 18:23:27 GMT, "Maria Conlon"
<maria.c-b@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Stephen Calder wrote:
Sir James Murray railed against the spellings abridgment, judgment as
unscholarly. The lawyers keep looking at their bibles and insisting on
an out-of-date spelling. The journalists, terrified of lawyers, cave
in.
"Terrified of" or "terrified by"? I would say the latter, but wonder if
this is a pondian thing.
My instinctive response is that the two mean slightly different
things. I'm having a hard time putting my finger on the precise
difference, though.
"Terrified by ..." suggests that you go pale and run if a lawyer comes
into the room, perhaps, whereas "of" is more a fear of having to
become involved with one in any way.
--
Katy Jennison
spamtrap: remove the first two letters after the @
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Terrified of [was Re: Regret the error]
- From: K. Edgcombe
- Re: Terrified of [was Re: Regret the error]
- From: Stephen Calder
- Re: Terrified of [was Re: Regret the error]
- References:
- Re: Regret the error
- From: Stephen Calder
- Terrified of [was Re: Regret the error]
- From: Maria Conlon
- Re: Regret the error
- Prev by Date: Re: Boiling water
- Next by Date: Re: usage question re: "to obsess"
- Previous by thread: Re: Terrified of [was Re: Regret the error]
- Next by thread: Re: Terrified of [was Re: Regret the error]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|