Re: Singular "they" [again} was re: ENGLISH!



Harvey Van Sickle wrote:
On 27 Feb 2006, Iskandar Baharuddin wrote

In order to weasel around this burning issue you have redefined
"singular".

It is really amusing to watch you NESsies struggling with a
problem unique to the English language.

Struggling? Idiomatic English stopped "struggling" with this issue a
long time ago.

Idiomatic English -- as you acknowledge and apparently condemn -- is
flexible. Insisting that the division between singular and plural
pronouns is sacrosanct is not only dogmatic but also, ultimately,
futile.

You call this "weasel[ing]". Others call it a strength based on
functionality.

To paraphrase Sir Winston Churchill:
"Never in the history of human debate have so many argued so much
over so little."

Except that there's no longer a meaningful argument.

Idiomatic English is in the process of adopting -- has near as dammit
adopted -- the former-third-person-plural as a useful non-gender-
specific singular pronoun.

The "debate" isn't there: the die-hards have lost.

Quite true: I often catch myself doing it, though I find it inelegant
and avoid it in writing. What's still interesting, though, is that
people haven't yet mastered its use. "Responsible dog-owners clean up
after their dog", which I quoted here a while back from a public notice,
is just one of the messes people are getting themselves into. "The man
who left their wallet in the lavatory can collect it from Reception" --
you know the kind of thing.

I'm getting the feeling that "they" and "their" are acquiring a status
more indefinite than simply that of common gender. Personally, I don't
like it (as if that mattered); but I wish I could live long enough to
see how it finally settles down. I'm inclined to speculate that this
apparent indefinite use is precisely a response to the absurdity of
using it for "his or her": as if there's a communal thought-process on
the lines of "It can't rationally mean that, so it must somehow refer to
_any_ person or persons unknown."

All this, of course, can't be happening in our time by coincidence. It
must be a response to our social decision that gendered words are to be
questioned. "Interrogated", as the theorists put it -- perhaps a
consciously scary choice of word.

--
Mike.


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Singular "they" [again} was re: ENGLISH!
    ... It is really amusing to watch you NESsies struggling with a ... problem unique to the English language. ... Idiomatic English is in the process of adopting -- has near as dammit ... specific singular pronoun. ...
    (alt.usage.english)
  • Re: Hint for users of Google Groups
    ... Better tie fts now or Mustapha will hopefully born them in response to you. ... Don't try to dissolve entirely while you're struggling according to a ... independent station. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: UK To Go Ahead With High Speed Rail
    ... I'm struggling with the need! ... Just the sort of response you would expect from a salaried man of the ... he has long been in my kill file. ... Your question is a perfectly valid one. ...
    (uk.railway)
  • Re: Why is -1 * -1 = 1 ?
    ... it just a law of arithmetic? ... I am struggling to find an intuitive ... explanation. ... I liked Arturo's response. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: [solved] Re: kombinations
    ... I think that this response is not useful at all to the OP, ... who is clearly still struggling with the basics of Prolog. ... One learns absolutely NOTHING about Prolog by learning about ... the built-ins used in Markus' solution. ...
    (comp.lang.prolog)